Congratulations to Dr Tsz F Pun

We are delighted to announce that Dr Tsz Pun from the Scanlon group at Monash University has been conferred the award Doctor Of Philosophy on 30 April 2025. Congratulations, Jason!

Jason’s thesis is titled: Applying and improving off-rate screening by SPR in the development of FABP4-selective chemical probes, makes a distinct and significant contribution to knowledge.

We are very thrilled and can’t wait to hear about his future endeavours.

Mollie Holman Award for Karol!

🎉 Amazing news! 🎉 Former PhD Candidate Karoline Sanches is the recipient of the 2025 Mollie Holman Award from Monash University. The Mollie Holman Award was established in 1998 and is named after the late pioneering physiologist, Emeritus Professor Mollie Holman AO, in honour of her significant contributions to science and education. This medal is one of the highest academic honours at Monash Uni and marks the recipients as researchers of the highest order. Karol received this award in recognition of her outstanding doctoral thesis entitled “Molecular Basis for Inhibition of the Voltage-Gated Potassium Channel Kvl.3 by Peptide Toxins”. We are very proud of Karol’s achievements.

Year’s end…

…is neither an end nor a beginning but a going on with all the wisdom that experience can instil in us. – Hal Berland

This year has been filled with the challenges of sorting out the remaining placements and achievements such as thesis submissions at the Monash and Sydney nodes. 

CFBD is slowly coming to an end but we can still look back on a number of achievements and experiences: 

  • Our Centre Director was appointed as MedChem Theme Leader in March
  • We held a joint ITRP Career Day at Swinburne Uni  in April
  • We took FBBD_DU and our Final Research Workshop to Brisbane in June
  • Brooke from the Monash node presented at BioMolecular Horizons in September
  • We co-hosted the international FBLD conference in Boston
  • Griffith CI Sally-Ann Poulsen received the 2024 Margaret Sheil Leadership Award in October

Let us carry forward this success as we enter the final year of CFBD. Wishing you all a restful break and a prosperous new year ahead.

Leadership Award for CFBD CI

We are proud to share that CFBD CI Prof Sally-Ann Poulsen was awarded the 2024 Margaret Sheil Leadership Award.

The aim of the award is to recognise an outstanding female leader working in an area of a chemistry-related field. This includes academia, teaching, and the public or private sector. The award is given to female leaders who have helped to inspire and mentor junior female chemists and/or help to provide a more equitable workplace. The award consists of a medal and support for a lecture tour within Australia with the aim of inspiring the next generation. The Margaret Sheil Leadership Award was presented at this year’s RACI Annual Awards Dinner. Again, congratulations to Prof Sally-Ann Poulsen.

CFBD supports FBLD in Boston

CFBD is proud to support this year’s FBLD conference in Boston with Centre Director Prof Martin Scanlon and Business Manager Anne Meyer being part of the organising committee.

Experts in the field of fragment-based lead design joined as invited speakers. The event is promising to deliver some exciting presentations. Registrations are encouraged from anyone interested in the fragments community. Follow this link to secure your spot before the deadline on 8 September:

Career Interviews – Dr Charlotte Williams

As the first interview for the series, we have Charlotte Williams, a Principal Research Scientist and Group Leader for Chemical Biology, Diagnostics and Devices within the Biomedical Manufacturing Program at CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation).

Q) Can you let us know a bit about yourself? What did you study for your postgraduate degree?

– I enjoyed science at school, particularly chemistry and so I enrolled at the University of Western Australia for my undergrad and did a double major in chemistry and biochemistry.

In my 3rd year, I was contemplating the honours program, and couldn’t decide between chemistry and biochemistry. After talking to a few lab supervisors and PhD students, I found a connection with chemistry and went on to enjoy my Honours year and research work in chemistry. I did traditional organic chemistry synthesis, expanding into transition metal complex synthesis for use as catalysts for use in Suzuki and Heck coupling reactions. It felt like a natural progression to do a PhD remaining at the University of Western Australia. I think it’s important for students to consider carefully the choice to enter into a PhD, since it is a big commitment lasting at least 3 years.

Q) After your postgraduate degree, how did you get to where you are now?

– Close to the end of my PhD, I began looking into what my next step could be. I started applying for jobs at various Australian biotech companies and post-docs in Australia and those open in the UK. I was grateful to accept a postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Oxford. This work involved organic chemistry as well as polymer chemistry, making monomers and then preparing conjugated polymers known as polyrotaxanes.

Towards the end of my postdoc, I heard through colleagues at the university, that Johnson Matthey Technology Centre (JMTC, UK) were looking for a chemist. After the application and interview process, I was offered a role there working on transition metal catalysts, and making transition metal nanoparticles. John Matthey is a large international organisation, a global leader in sustainable technologies, well known for their work in transition metal chemistry including the preparation of platinum anti-cancer drugs related to cisplatin.

After a year or so, I started looking for jobs to move back to Australia and applied for a post-doctoral fellowship at the CRC for Polymers in Melbourne. I had also seen an advert for a role at an Australian Biotech company, Starpharma, also based in Melbourne. I was thankful to be offered both roles and with a keen interest in Biotech, I was given great advice to make decisions based on what I wanted to do for my career, not what I thought I should do. I started working at Starpharma, where I worked and gained experience making dendrimers for drug delivery, which are highly ordered, branched polymeric molecules.

After 5 ½ years in Biotech, I began to think about my next steps. My network connections led me to an interview at CSIRO, which is where I have worked since 2009 as a research scientist. In the Biomedical Manufacturing Program at CSIRO, we assist Australian Biotech and Medtech companies in their growth strategies. Delivering to organic chemistry, polymer chemistry and bioconjugation chemistry focussed projects I developed project leadership skills, client engagement and became a Team Leader. My current role as a Group Leader involves operational and capability management, mentoring and people leadership while maintaining active involvement in business development, projects, and science leadership.

Q) Were there any differences you noticed in your experiences working with these different companies?

-Yes, the experiences were quite different, working for a Biotech company such as Starpharma versus working for a large company like Johnson Matthey. In a Biotech, the focus is on very narrow goals and strategic outcomes that are important for the company, and you often learn about each different area that is required to move a lead towards each stage for translation.

Working in a large company like Johnson Matthey, you can be exposed to a broad range of science areas, and you often get to contribute across varied projects, which helps you to expand your knowledge into different skill sets. At Johnson Matthey, I learnt to think about, and plan for, the translation of processes from R&D to pilot scale. At CSIRO, I often work across a range of multidisciplinary projects, constantly developing new processes and products, delivering different science outputs, and always learning from the expertise of my colleagues.

Q) How did you decide that you wanted to step into industry and away from academia?

– As I was finishing my postdoc, I considered the prospects of working in academia versus industry. I enjoyed the research aspects of academia and the scientific freedom that academia offers, as well as the opportunity to support the next generation of students, but the industry opportunity was available and I was keen to find out what working in industry was like.

Working at Johnson Matthey right after my postdoc was a great experience; I enjoyed the work and made friends and connections, many of whom I’m still in contact with. This first role in industry taught me a lot and presented opportunities. Working on process optimisation, I was able to see the R&D chemistry that I developed, and transferred to the scale-up facilities across the country, where reaction vessels stood from floor to ceiling, which was quite fascinating. Looking back, I never thought of going back to academia after working in the industry.

Q) Did you feel any changes when shifting from academia to industry? How was the translation?

– Yes, there are changes between academia and industry.

With that first initial move to the industry, I realized I needed to think beyond my particular project and more broadly how that project fits into the bigger picture or strategy of the company.  Often working in industry, you have timelines to deliver to, for example, delivery of a project for an external client on budget and on time. When I see ECRs move from academia to industry, sometimes the transition to timeline-based work and adherence to protocols and industry systems is a new process that we support them with.    

 Adhering to certain protocols for example, in industry is often company policy, whereas at a university it is possible that certain protocols vary between research groups.  Working in industry, you have to focus on the whole company strategy and alignment, where the work we do supports that bigger picture thinking.

Q) What are the skills you felt you needed or learned as you joined the industry?

– In general, at the entry level, the industry is looking for core expertise at the bench. Everything you learn builds on the skills and expertise you will need for the next steps, and each upskilling leads you down your career pathway.

Often those on-the-bench skills, are learnt at each job, and this training is sometimes preferred in industry once you start working there, rather than new employees being expected to have all these skills upon entry. Other things I learned were science communication, critical thinking, problem-solving, taking responsibility for one’s own work, reaching out to colleagues for their expertise and input and recognising when that input was needed.

Q) Any interesting ideas you have in mind to try out in future?

– One thing I’ve realised is that the more you do, the more widely you engage and work on various multidisciplinary projects, and the more ideas come to you. At CSIRO, when we find ourselves with really exciting science opportunities or ideas that we are interested in exploring, that sit outside of our support of the Biotech and MedTech communities, there are different ways of doing that in CSIRO. One of these paths is through our post-doctoral program. We have been exploring novel antibody-drug-conjugates within the Program, as a way to treat a range of disease states.

Q) Can you also tell us about publishing in companies?

– I suspect this largely depends on the policies of each of the different companies. At CSIRO, there are plenty of opportunities to publish, and this also held true at Starpharma Pty Ltd. At CSIRO, we track our metrics to identify our impact on the science community based on publications. A lot of publications do tend to come through those post-doc positions.

At Johnson Matthey, I did not publish. At many companies, often science that is developed is either patented or kept as a trade secret. Many companies choose to patent these technologies and techniques first, prior to publishing, in order to protect the patent.

Q) What advice would you give to someone facing an interview?

– As much as possible, try to relax and be yourself, give and take, equally listening and responding, making sure to use the interview as a chance to see how you might fit with the company as much as they are seeking if you are a good fit for their needs. When a company advertises for a role, there will very often be selection criteria. My advice is, to make sure you answer the selection criteria. Sometimes in interviews, the questions may be technical as the company wants to employ someone who will be able to do the science that they need, but then again the ability to train on the job is also a huge advantage. I always encourage people to be specific including the details of the chemistry that you’ve done. The panel may ask specific questions, which can be intimidating, but think it through, take the time and be aware that if you know your chemistry, you can always answer these questions.

Industry (as anywhere) is looking for someone who can fit with their team, someone who communicates well and someone with whom they can get on. Take a look at what the roles at the company might be and do a bit of homework to get that extra knowledge about the company. It is also natural to be nervous at an interview but you should just try your best!

-One of the key things is to talk to people, and through talking to people you can learn and make new connections which will always be a very valuable experience.

Also, when joining a company, apart from the amazing science, infrastructure and exposure to different types of projects in science, it is also important to have mentors, support and guidance and to enjoy the people you work with.

– Thank you, Charlotte for letting us have a glimpse at your journey so far and sharing your experiences with us!

Outstanding achievement – CFBD Director appointed Theme Leader

We are thrilled to announce that CFBD Director Prof Martin Scanlon has been appointed as the new Theme Leader for Medicinal Chemistry at Monash University in Parkville.

Professor Scanlon will lead a team of scientists focused on synthetic medicinal chemistry, structure-based drug design, fragment screening and academic drug discovery.  In addition to CFBD and the Monash Fragment Platform, the Medicinal Chemistry Theme also comprises the Australian Translational Medicinal Chemistry Facility and MedChem Australia (in collaboration with WEHI and The University of Sydney).

More about Prof Scanlon’s appointment and career highlights can be found here.

NHMRC success

Congratulations to 3 CFBD CIs for being awarded NHMRC Grants totalling almost $3 million.

Prof Ray Norton has been awarded an NHMRC Development Grant worth $753,140

His project is titled “Development of a Kv1.3 Potassium Channel Inhibitor as a New Class of Treatment for Diabetic Kidney Disease”. Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a major public health problem, which is associated with kidney failure, cardiovascular disease and premature death. Current therapies often fail to stop disease progression. There is an urgent need for innovative strategies to prevent, arrest and reverse the development of DKD. Ray’s project will advance the development of a novel therapeutic for DKD that acts by a different mechanism from current drugs and has shown considerable promise in animal models of DKD.

Prof Michael Kassiou was successful with NHMRC Ideas Grant

His project titled “Developing Senolytics for treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis” received a total of $1,037,875. When the body senses damaged cells, it can usually eliminate them, but dangerous senescent cells upregulate proteins such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl which make them resistant to the body’s elimination processes. These senescent cells accumulate in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We are developing novel Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl inhibitors which selectively eliminate these senescent cells without eliminating healthy cells to examine the role of senescence in ALS and to develop new ALS treatments.

Prof Joel Mackay also received NHMRC Ideas Grant

For his project “RaPID assessment of the chromatin remodeller CHD4 as a therapeutic target for hemoglobinopathies using a new target validation strategy”, Joel has been awarded $1,133,816. Recently, the enzyme CHD4 has emerged as a possible therapeutic target for hemoglobinopathies. However, no molecules exist that specifically inhibit its activity. The goal of this project is to develop specific chemical probes to assess the potential of CHD4 inhibition for the treatment of hematological disorders. The work will also provide proof-of-principle for a new strategy that we propose for faster validation of therapeutic targets.

Multiple prizes for CFBD members at the 18th Annual Graduate Research Symposium

The Parkville Postgraduate Association (PPA) at Monash University held its 18th Annual Graduate Research Symposium yesterday. The main focus of the Symposium is to give graduate research students a platform to showcase their current research whilst improving their public speaking and presentation skills in the form of oral and poster presentations. The annual event provides an excellent opportunity to learn more about the diverse research carried out at the Monash Parkville Campus.

This year, CFBD members were particularly successful at the event: PhD Candidate Jeyan Osman won the People’s Choice Oral Presentation Award worth $150, PhD Candidate Jason Pun received the Oral Presentation Encouragement Award ($100) and PhD Candidate Imesha Hettige Most Outstanding Poster Presentation Award worth $300. Congratulations to all winners at the event!